Skip to main content
UCP Knowledge NetworkApplied knowledge for action
Reports and books_icon

Increasing Knowledge and Partnerships on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support for Helpers in Pandemics (IPP): D 2.2 Report on needs of helpers and status quo

Published on 19 March 2024
Increasing Knowledge and Partnerships on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support for Helpers in Pandemics: Report on needs of helpers and status quo
Reports and books

Increasing Knowledge and Partnerships on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support for Helpers in Pandemics (IPP): D 2.2 Report on needs of helpers and status quo

(3.79 MB - PDF)
Download
Introduction

Recent studies about the psychosocial consequences of nonpharmacological measures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic show negative impacts on the mental health of the population in general. Relatively high rates of symptoms of anxiety, depression and also trauma symptoms alongside decreased wellbeing are reported (Xiong et al., 2020). Health care workers are especially affected due to higher exposition, loss of a
feeling of safety and experience of moral distress (Pappa et al., 2020; Kreh et al., 2020). Exhaustion and frustration increase over the course of the pandemic, as recovery phases are rare. Helpers are facing unique challenges, working under extraordinary circumstances and extreme pressure, while worried about contracting the disease or transmitting it to their families.

This has revealed the importance of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) for all helpers in an epidemic or pandemic. While some peer support is in place in partner countries, this is often not the case for hospital staff or ad-hoc established crisis teams. In Armenia and Georgia many MHPSS structures are just being developed with support of the National Red Cross Societies and Universities.

This report gives an overview of the research on helpers“ needs in pandemics as well as international guidelines and best practices on MHPSS for helpers in pandemics. It furthermore contains data analysis of a mixed methods study conducted in the partner countries Georgia and Armenia on the status quo of helpers in the Red Cross, nursing homes, hospitals and hotline operators.

Authors

University of Innsbruck, Ilia State University Georgia, Armenian Red Cross, Georgia Red Cross

Disclaimer
Information and views set out in this community page can also be those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.

Hazard types

Multi-hazard

DRM Phases

Preparedness Response

Geographic focus

Eastern Neighbourhood

Sectors

Health