Skip to main content
UCP Knowledge NetworkApplied knowledge for action
Via the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, the European Commission has been coordinating medical evacuations of patients from Gaza to provide them with access to urgent medical care.

‘Equality and inclusion go hand in hand with a secure Europe’

Published on

Knowledge Series event on preparedness and gender equality and inclusion in disaster risk management takes place in Brussels.

By Knowledge Network – Staff member

Disasters are not gender neutral. Gender inequalities caused by socioeconomic conditions, cultural beliefs, and traditional practices are behind a disproportional impact of disasters on women and girls. 

Around 15% of the world's population lives with some form of disability, and this percentage is likely to increase in emergency situations. Yet these groups, often the most vulnerable during an emergency, are often excluded from decision-making processes. Only one EU country currently allocates money for disability measures in civil protection.

A Knowledge Series event on Inclusive Preparedness: Gender Equality and Inclusion in Disaster Risk Management brought together policymakers, project managers, and first responders from across the EU last week to look at these questions, and how to make disaster response and preparedness more inclusive. 

‘Equality is about giving everyone the same resources, independent of who they are and of their background’.

Gaetano Vivo, Deputy Head of Unit, Prevention and Preparedness (also DG ECHO) underlined that equality and inclusion were vital to civil protection and should go ‘hand in hand with a prosperous and more secure Europe’.  

Anna emphasised the need to ensure vulnerable people (e.g. children, women, the elderly and people with a disability) are considered in civil protection, highlighting that women and children are 14 times more likely to die in an emergency than men. However, it is also important to remember that ‘no one is born vulnerable’ she added, but ‘we become vulnerable as life circumstances impact us.’ 

World Bank’s approach to mainstreaming inclusive resilience

Cristina Otano, from the World Bank’s Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction (GFDRR) took us through the Bank’s experience in mainstreaming inclusive resilience. She explained how good practices in this area can be applied in technical assistance and the design of projects, as well as policy operations.

‘It always comes back to data’

Mirtha Liliana Escobar, also from the World Bank, considered what advocacy in this area looked like. Although the World Bank has been investing in this area, it needs champions, she pointed out. According to Mirtha it always comes back to data, especially gender-disaggregated data, which there is never enough of. That’s why the World Bank partners with other organisations in this area e.g. UN Women.

A new procedure on how to evacuate those with disabilities in an emergency situation is currently being developed and approved at national level. Representatives from the community of persons with disabilities are closely involved to ensure that no one is left behind, and a national strategy on Disaster Risk Reduction is being developed in parallel with the World Bank. As Elena Treanta from the Romanian Department of Emergency added, the project has been very well received in Romania and the organisers are now keen to roll it out in other countries too.

‘This is just the beginning for us’ the project leaders add.

SEE ME & SEE ME  2

Meanwhile, the SEE ME (and follow-up SEE ME 2) project in Croatia has focused on training rescuers in locating and supporting Persons with Disabilities following a disaster, as well as training 112 operators to help support those with disabilities in an emergency. 

The Project Manager, Igor Detelj, told us how the project organisers have also been working with other countries to share good practice; for example, at a Para swimming club (Cipal) in Italy, where firefighters have been working with members to provide emergency training for Persons with Disabilities on rescue and preventing drowning.

European Disability Forum: Examples of good practice from across the EU

Gordon Rattray, from the European Disability Forum (EDF) described his organisation as people committed to working for people with disabilities, whilst also having disabilities themselves.  Some 100 million people are across Europe are described as having a disability. Gordon highlighted the current gaps in disaster risk reduction: 84% of persons with disabilities lack a disaster preparedness plan, 86% have never been involved in disaster risk reduction planning and only 8% say local DRR plans address their needs. He gave the recent Valencia floods as an example; when 200 people lost their lives in the floods, their gender and age was recorded, but there was no data on whether the victims had disabilities.

Some examples of good practice from EDF members across the EU include: Ieder (in), a Dutch project which has provided training for emergency response (112) operators on how to communicate with Persons with Disabilities, and is looking at a non-digital emergency alarm test; Susteno Latvia, which has worked on training and education, as well as raising public awareness on the importance of more inclusive emergency plans; Spain’s Fundación Once, which includes video interpretation using sign language to help improve accessibility to the 112 emergency number; and the Lithuania Disability Forum, which has worked on the legal framework to facilitate inclusion of Persons with Disabilities.

Hans Ulrich Goessl (Head of Unit of Civil Protection Policy Unit at DG ECHO) rounded off the discussion by highlighting the recent figures from the Eurobarometer on Citizen Preparedness in the EU: 60% of Europeans do not feel well-prepared for disasters, 50% do not know what to do in an emergency scenario, and two-thirds (66%) say they need more information on disaster preparedness. 

These trends are consistent across various vulnerable groups, including persons with disabilities. More inclusive disaster response modules are being developed; for example the new EU Preparedness Strategy (March 2025) will emphasise whole-of-society preparedness.


Funding options (under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, TAFF, Erasmus+) are available for inclusion-focused preparedness. To find out more, go to Knowledge Series | UCP Knowledge Network.

1 Like

About the author

The Knowledge Network – Staff member

The Knowledge Network editorial team is here to share the news and stories of the Knowledge Network community. We'd love to hear your news, events and personal stories about your life in civil protection and disaster risk management. If you've got a story to share, please contact us.

Sectors

Risk reduction & assessment

Thematic series

Knowledge Series