Skip to main content
UCP Knowledge NetworkApplied knowledge for action
Reports and books_icon

Rapid, user-friendly, cost-effective DNA and library Preparation methods for wholegenome sequencing of bacteria with varying cell wall composition and GC content using minimal DNA on the illumina platform

Published on 23 May 2025
Keywords: ATCC bacteria, Bacillus, Library preparation kits, Extraction methods, Whole genome sequencing, Plasmid, Sequencing depth, CBRN biothreats
Reports and booksResearch papers

Rapid, user-friendly, cost-effective DNA and library Preparation methods for wholegenome sequencing of bacteria with varying cell wall composition and GC content using minimal DNA on the illumina platform

(1.87 MB - PDF)
Download
Author details
Bearzatto, Bertrand; Durant, Jean-François; Ambroise, Jérôme, Gala, Jean-Luc Gala
- Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), UCLouvain, Belgium
Unique identifier
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091261
Summary

Whole-genome sequencing using high-throughput sequencing is essential for identifying and characterising chromosomes and plasmids in nosocomial and environmental bacterial pathogens, including those with bioterrorism potential, according to the report. To expedite investigations on outbreaks, including accidental or intentional bacterial release, without compromising sequencing quality, the authorsnevaluated a more time-efficient, user-friendly, and cost-effective approach, using minimal DNA (~1 ng) from a single bacterial colony. Four DNA extraction methods were compared:
the automated nucleic acid extractor (EZ1 Advanced, Qiagen) with or without DNA purification using AMPure® beads (EZ1 vs. EZ1-AMP), and two rapid and inexpensive methods: heat shock lysis (HS), and glass bead disruption (GBD).
Additionally, four library preparation kits were evaluated: Illumina DNA Prep (DN), Illumina Nextera XT (XT), Roche KAPA HyperPlus (KP), and NEBNext® Ultra™ II FS DNA Library Prep Kit (NN).
Results - Whole-genome sequencing performance was evaluated on Bacillus cereus (B. cereus), Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), and Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) ATCC strains.
Key performance indicators included sequencing depth evenness across chromosome and plasmids (accounting for GC bias), genome assembly quality, measured by contig number, N50, genome fraction, and percentage of mismatches.

Key performance indicators confirmed that DNA and library preparation methods significantly influenced WGS quality. GBD enabled efficient sequencing across all three bacterial species, while HS proved inadequate for spore-forming bacteria B. cereus. DN, KP, and NN produced high-quality results with low GC bias, whereas XT exhibited significant GC bias and lower quality for bacteria with low GC content.
Conclusions - This study highlights the importance of selecting suitable DNA and sequencing library preparation methods based on bacterial cell wall composition and GC content for optimal HTS outcomes.

Disclaimer
Information and views set out in this community page can also be those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.

Hazard types

CBRNE

DRM Phases

Recovery Response

Geographic focus

Italy all Europe/EU

Sectors

Anticipation and foresight

Risk drivers

Changing security landscape Technological developments