Skip to main content
UCP Knowledge NetworkApplied knowledge for action
Cows on a grass in Austria.

The Value of Grazing as a Wildfire Prevention Tool

Published on

Grazing is vital for wildfire prevention, reducing fuel loads, modifying vegetation, and aiding ecosystem recovery. It decreases flammable materials and supports biodiversity and rural economies. Integrating grazing into wildfire management enhances resilience against wildfires. Here we explore how grazing works and its success in EU-supported projects.

Wildfires
By Knowledge Network – Staff member

Additionally, grazing can lead to changes in the plant community that grow, favouring those that are less likely to catch fire. For example, spring grazing can reduce invasive annual grasses and promote native bunchgrasses. This change in vegetation types and the overall reduction in fuel can lower the intensity and speed of wildfires, making grazed areas less likely to fire ignitions and easier to manage if they do occur. 

However, it is necessary to adjust grazing to the carrying capacity of the ecosystem. Overgrazing can lead to degradation and biodiversity loss, undermining the ecological balance and health of the landscape. Therefore, sustainable grazing practices should be carefully managed to prevent overgrazing and ensure that the benefits to wildfire prevention and ecosystem health are maintained.

Incorporating grazing into wildfire management, including forests, alongside other nature-based and traditional strategies like prescribed burning, offers a natural and sustainable approach to wildfire prevention. Additionally, sustainable grazing supports the management of grassland habitats that host diverse biodiversity, crucial for ecosystem recovery following fires.

Grazing as a Sustainable Solution

In several areas in Spain and Portugal, farmers graze their livestock in strategically designated fire break zones. This grazing reduces the amount of vegetation that could potentially catch fire, thereby decreasing the likelihood of forest fires during extreme weather conditions. The objective of this approach is to “maintain” areas already cleared of tree cover so that they act as fuel breaks. 

Supported by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), the project contributed to restoring and maintaining neglected firebreak strips, clearing dead wood, and thinning high-risk trees. Results included clearing 2.29 hectares of forest, restoring 5.82 hectares of firebreak strips, and creating additional feeding areas for livestock. This dual approach supports ecosystem health and reduces future fire risks. 

GrazeLIFE Project

Another good example is the GrazeLIFE project, supported by the European Commission, which has demonstrated that grazing can create breaks and patches of shorter, less dense vegetation, thus interrupting the fuel continuity that fires need to spread rapidly. Moreover, grazing influences the composition of plant species, favouring those less prone to ignition or with lower flammability, which helps in reducing the intensity and speed of wildfires. 

LIFE Montserrat Project

The LIFE Montserrat project, set in the Montserrat Mountain area of Catalonia, Spain, aimed to enhance forest resilience and biodiversity through ecosystem-based measures, particularly focusing on grazing management. Covering 42,487 hectares, with 64% forest and significant inclusion in the Natura 2000 network, the region faced heightened wildfire risks due to fuel load accumulation and climate change. The project has implemented a comprehensive holistic plan integrating grazing and forest restoration across a significant area. Achievements include reducing forest density, restoring open habitats, and establishing livestock farming units. Grazing effectively curbed wildfire spread, boosted biodiversity, and supported local economies. The project also successfully tested prescribed burning, promoting sustainable land management and socio-economic growth in the region.

How Member States and Regions Can Benefit

Member States and regions can include grazing as part of their wildfire prevention strategies by integrating it into their fuel management and rural development programmes. Member States can design a range of different interventions to support such practices and dedicate part of the CAP budget to specific pastoral systems. Support to ruminant livestock farms can be available through measures related to income support, eco-schemes, agro-environmental interventions, and rural development policies. 

Author: Kira Kolesnik, DG ECHO B.3, Prevention and Preparedness Capacity-Building Unit  

3 Likes

About the author

The Knowledge Network – Staff member

The Knowledge Network editorial team is here to share the news and stories of the Knowledge Network community. We'd love to hear your news, events and personal stories about your life in civil protection and disaster risk management. If you've got a story to share, please contact us.

Risk drivers

Environmental degradation

Thematic series

Prevention and preparedness activities