Skip to main content
UCP Knowledge NetworkApplied knowledge for action
Case studies_icon

The Metaponto model: the case study of CNR-IMAA as a high road in monitoring for the preservation of archaeological and natural areas

Published on 3 July 2025
A case study from Italy, exploring how remote sensing can assist in protecting cultural heritage sites through the Disaster Risk Management phases
Case studies
Author details
Corvino, Antonio - Università Suor Orsola Benincasa; Abate, Nicodemo - Researcher, National Research Council -Institute of Heritage Science (ISPC); Lasaponara, Rosa- Research Director, National Research Council -Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (IMAA), Italy
Unique identifier
ISSN 2975-190X – ISBN 978-88-6864-548-9

The concept of cultural heritage preservation dates to ancient civilisations like the Romans, who valued and protected artefacts for collective benefit. Over time, the approach to preservation evolved, influenced by factors like globalisation and technological advancements. Today, cultural heritage faces new challenges, including natural disasters and human activities. Innovative approaches, such as the National Research Council's study of climate change impact on the archaeological site of Metaponto, Italy, demonstrate the effectiveness of using advanced technologies like remote sensing for risk management and crisis response. The success of these approaches highlights their potential applicability to cultural heritage sites globally, offering streamlined solutions for preservation and protection. KEYWORDS: cultural heritage, archaeological sites, remote sensing, disaster risk management, response, monitoring. In PROCULTHER-NET 2 Project. Technical Bulletin N. 4, December 2024, pp 65 – 71.

Disclaimer
Information and views set out in this community page can also be those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.

Hazard types

Multi-hazard Societal

DRM Phases

Recovery Response

Geographic focus

Italy

Sectors

Cultural Heritage

Risk drivers

Technological developments